next up previous contents
Next: 19990729: same as 19990702, Up: MD work on Previous: 19990727: same as 19990709,


19990728: same as 19990707, but with longer equilibration period

GOAL

Influence of the equilibration period: run on utsj90 exactly the same calc as in 19990707 safe that the equilibration time is ten times longer ( $50000\;\mathit{steps}$ here, $5000\;\mathit{steps}$ in 19990707).

I undertook this calc because I had troubles with DL_POLY on t3e (19990727); then the problems on t3e were overcome, but by then this calc was already on the way. So I kept it, even if it is the utsj90 copy of 19990727.

It can be used as a further comparison between the two machines (in this regard, see also 19990709)

Results

As expected, this calculation compares with its counterpart 19990707 in the same way as 19990727 compares with 19990709:

\begin{center}\vbox{\input{19990728-01.pslatex}
}\end{center}



More interesting is the direct comparison between 19990728 (this one) and 19990727: they are two identical calculations, run on two different machines (19990727 on t3e, 19990728 on utsj90).

\begin{center}\vbox{\input{19990728-02.pslatex}
}\end{center}



This (and 19990709) makes us confident in comparing calculations from these two different machines.


next up previous contents
Next: 19990729: same as 19990702, Up: MD work on Previous: 19990727: same as 19990709,