Aspartic proteases

In the last two decades the important biological role of aspartic proteases has come into clear focus. In particular, it is now clear that enzymes of this class are involved in several severe pathologies such as, for example, AIDS, cancer, Alzheimer's disease, malaria.

The aspartic protease from HIV is a symmetric homodimer, formed by two monomers related by a C2 symmetry axis. The picture shows the crystal structure of HIV1-PR complexed with an inhibitor. Carbon chains are coloured by hydrophobicity of the residues.

Click on the picture to enlarge it

The general acid-general base mechanism, that is considered most likely for polypeptide hydrolysis catalyzed by aspartic proteases (Figure), requires one Asp residue to be protonated, while the second must be ionized and there is indeed experimental evidence that the two aspartates share one proton at a physiological pH. The scissile amide bond undergoes nucleophilic attack by a water molecule which is activated by the depro­tonated catalytic aspartic acid residue. The protonated aspartic acid donates a proton to the amide bond nitrogen, generating a tetrahedral zwitterionic intermediate which collapses to the cleaved products with a similar mechanism, in the slow step of the reaction.[i] An additional water molecule binds between the substrate and the main chain amide groups of the enzyme (at the level of Ile50 and Ile50’) and is thought to twist the scissile peptide bond out of planarity, thereby facilitating the cleavage of this bond.[ii]

 

Mechanism of hydrolysis of aspartic proteases.

The active site of aspartic proteases does not in general contain groups that are sufficiently nucleophilic to be chemically modified by a selective irreversible inhibitor. The catalytic aspartates can be alkylated only by strong electrophiles, such as epoxides, that are potentially cytotoxic.[iii] The picture shows the active site with the two catalytic aspartates coloured green.

Click on the picture to enlarge it.

Thus, most aspartic protease inhibitors that have been developed to date bind to their target enzyme through noncovalent interactions (i.e. hydrogen bonds, ionic or van der Waal’s contacts). These compounds are therefore reversible inhibitors, and an effective inhibition results when the enzyme has higher affinity for the inhibitor than for its natural substrate. It has been proposed that stable structures which resemble the transition state of an enzyme catalyzed reaction should bind the enzyme more tightly than the substrate. An approach that has proved very successful for the design of efficient aspartic protease inhibitors is based on the incorporation of a transition-state analog into a peptidomimetic structure. A transition-state isostere is defined as a functional group that can mimic the tetrahedral transition-state of amide bond hydroly­sis, but is stable and non hydrolyzable.

Among transition-state isosteres that have been successfully used in the design of aspartic protease inhibitors, hydroxy-based isosteres have proved particularly effective. The picture shows how inhibitor A76889 fits into the active site of HIV1-PR.

Click on the picture to enlarge it.

Crystallographic structures of aspartic proteases can be downloaded from the Protein Data Bank. We used Web Lab Viewer to render the images.



[i] Hyland, L. J.; Tomaszek, T. A.; Meek, T. D. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 8454-8463.

[ii] Chatfield, D. C.; Brooks, B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5561-5572.

[iii] a) Salto, R.; Babè, L. M.; Li, J.; Rosè, J. R.; Yu, Z.; Burlingame, A.; DeVoss, J. J.; Sui, Z.; Ortiz de Montellano, P.; Craick, C. S. J. Mol.Biol. 1994, 269, 10691; b) Abell, A. D.; Hoult, D. A.; Bergman, D. A.; Fairlie, D.P.Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2853; c) DeVoss, J. J.; Sui, Z.; DeCamp, D. L.; Salto, R.; Babè, L. M.; Craick, C. S.; Ortiz de Montellano, P. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 665; d) Jones, P. R.; Burlingame, A. L.; Kuntz, I. D.; Craick, C. S.; Ortiz de Montellano P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5846; e) Said, B.; Matsumoto, D. C.; Hamade, A. K.; Shank, R. C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 261, 844-847.